Nothing governs this room. A basketball court answers to one sport and a ballet studio to one; a hall answers to whatever the timetable puts on it, and then takes stacking chairs on a Friday. So the scoring set has to be declared, not implied. KTL's own sport list for a multi-purpose hall names ten sports, and one of them, netball, has no row anywhere in their ratings matrix. We score the other nine and add the three matrix rows a hall genuinely uses: gymnastics, table tennis and multiple usage. Twelve rows, three points for very suitable down to none for unsuitable, 36 available. FlexiPRO 12 V3, PRO III, PRO II V2 and Multiflex Advanced V2 all reach 35, and nothing else does.
The scoring catches KTL disagreeing with themselves. Their usage class for a multi-purpose hall recommends FlexiPRO 21 with vinyl, PU or Lino. Vinyl and PU are exactly the coverings their own certificate line ties to the 6-9 mm resilient, combi-elastic EN 14904 C4 result, and that build scores 18 out of 36 across these twelve rows: less suitable for basketball, futsal, gymnastics, wheelchair basketball, indoor hockey and table tennis, and unsuitable for squash. The same FlexiPRO 21 subfloor under a 2-4 mm non-resilient covering is EN 14904 A4, area-elastic, and scores 30. The hall recommendation does not distinguish the two. KTL do make a distinction one class up, where the arena entry for FlexiPRO 21 is qualified as not for basketball or squash; the hall entry carries no such qualification on the same ratings. Lino, meanwhile, appears in the recommendation and in neither certificate line, so what class it produces is not published at all.
Load class then does the work performance could not. KTL define the hall load case as ball games, racket games, a wide range of sports, standard load such as transport of equipment, and cultural events. Telescopic seatings on floors and stage floors appear only under Large Arena. That is an omission and not a prohibition, so the honest test is what will actually cross this floor rather than what a class letter permits. On that test, standard point and rolling load is a specification for this room rather than a compromise, which is why Multiflex Advanced V2 is the wrong floor for an arena and the right one here. It is also the only system KTL name on their hall list and leave off their arena list. If the hall genuinely takes retractable seating or scissor-lift access, it is not a multi-purpose hall in KTL's sense and the answer changes.
Squash is the row that produces the top four, and it is worth saying what happens without it. Both portable systems and both FlexiPRO 21 builds are rated unsuitable for squash and Multi Clip only suitable, while the four leaders are all very suitable. Take that row out and six systems tie at 32: the four leaders, Multi Clip and Portable PRO Summit V2, with Portable PRO one point behind on basketball, where it is rated suitable rather than very suitable. Squash realistically wants its own sealed court. So unless squash is genuinely in the brief, the sport grid separates almost nothing, and load class, build height and certification are the whole decision.
What is left is height and paperwork. The four leaders run 39 mm for FlexiPRO 12 V3, 52 mm for Multiflex Advanced V2, 64 mm for PRO II V2 (86-144 mm on KTL wedges) and 76 mm for PRO III (96-156 mm on wedges), against door thresholds, floor sockets and store transitions that are usually already built. Two of the four carry EN 14904 A4 with both a FIBA licence and BWF Grade 1 International Elite: Multiflex Advanced V2 on FIBA 2020 Level 1 licence WF73-02, and PRO II V2 on WF73-01. Multiflex Advanced V2 is the shallower of those two, at the load class this room actually imposes.