The badminton row is almost flat. KTL rate badminton very suitable on eight of their nine systems, and only FlexiPRO 21 with an elastic covering drops a level, to suitable. Score the nine columns across the five matrix rows this page uses, badminton, multiple usage, volleyball, table tennis and pickleball, and seven of the nine tie at 14 points out of 15, every one of them losing the same single point on volleyball. Widen it to badminton, pickleball, table tennis, volleyball, basketball, handball and multiple usage, which is closer to what a hall this size actually books, and six of the nine still tie, at 20 out of 21. Either way the grid has not told you which floor to specify.
What discriminates is BWF Grade 1 International Elite, and exactly three systems carry it: Multiflex Advanced V2, PRO II V2 and Portable PRO. KTL are a member of the Badminton World Federation, but membership is a company statement and the grade appears on three system pages only. Of the six systems without it, three carry a FIBA licence, WF73-07 on Portable PRO Summit V2, WF73-06 on FlexiPRO 12 V3 and WF73-03 on PRO III, and all nine carry an EN 14904 class. Five FIBA licences exist across the range in total, and the other two sit on badminton-graded systems. For a hall that intends to host sanctioned badminton, those three graded systems are the shortlist.
The grade does not follow KTL's own designations. It is not on Portable PRO Summit V2, the portable they designate for professional basketball and other fast ball games in large sport and event arenas, and which is class A3 where Portable PRO is class A4. It is not on PRO III, the tallest fixed system they make, whose thicker batten they say gives it the ultimate level in stability, and whose designed-for line names badminton at the highest level in words identical to PRO II V2's. It is not on FlexiPRO 12 V3, the high load glue-down they designate for large arenas and name badminton in as well. It is on the portable KTL describe for non-professional use, on the 64 mm batten system rather than the 76 mm one, and on the standard load system they designate for multi-purpose halls and studios.
Between the three, the load case decides, and KTL define both classes. They set the Large Arena class at ball games and racket games at the highest level, telescopic seatings on floors, stage floors, and exhibitions and shows. They set the Multi-Purpose Hall class at ball games, racket games, a wide range of sports, standard load such as transport of equipment, and cultural events. Both classes name racket games, so what separates them is the seating, the staging and the exhibition traffic, and the load that comes with it. Multiflex Advanced V2 is standard load and appears on KTL's recommended list for the hall class and not for the arena class; PRO II V2 and Portable PRO are high load and appear on both. So the question to settle before the load class is signed off is not what badminton does to a floor, since both classes cover it. It is whether seating, staging or exhibition traffic ever crosses the floor, and what the heaviest wheeled thing in the building is.
Two absences should travel with the enquiry. FIBA is licensed per system and the number is published, while BWF appears only as the words Grade 1 International Elite, with no certificate reference, issue date or stated scope anywhere in the document. And no friction or slip resistance value appears at all. Every candidate is declared compliant with EN 14904 and the class letter is all KTL publish, so for badminton, where a floor that is too slick and one that is too grippy fail in opposite directions, the class letter is not a specification. No shock absorption, vertical deformation or ball rebound value is published either, only the class letters.